DESIGNATION OF THE MARKS OF QUALITY

Organoleptic Character

  • Visual aspect
  • Nose : Intensity
  • Nose : Quality
  • Taste and retronasal sensations : Intensity
  • Taste and retronasal sensations : Quality
  • General impression, harmony

A scale of evaluation of at least 5 columns is provided for each organoleptic character

  • 1. Excellent (0 point of penalty)
  • 2. Very Good (1 point of penalty)
  • 3. Good (2 points of penalty)
  • 4. Inadequate (4 points of penalty)
  • 5. Eliminated (Eliminated)

Transcription and calculation of the results



Still Wines
Sparkling Wines
Visual
Aspect
-
x 1

Foam
- x 2

Limpidity
x 1 -
Noze
Intensity
x 1 x 1

Quality
x 2 x 2
Taste
Effervescence
- x 2

Intensity
x 2 x 2

Quality
x 3 x 3
Harmony

x 3 x 3

Each sample receives a rating which is the median rating based on the ratings resulting from the calculation of the evaluation of each of the jurors.

When there is an odd number of jurors, the median is immediately evident. If the number happens to be even, the median is based on the average of the closest two ratings in the middle of the ratings.

Conferring the Awards

Awards Still Wines Sparkling Wines
0 - 8
0 - 13
9 - 14
14 - 21
15 - 21
22 - 30

  • The sum of all medals must not exceed 1/3 of participating wines
  • The samples that obtained the least good results are eliminated.
Chardonnay du Monde® Informations

Some figures of Chardonnay du Monde:

Medal count by Country:

2018 2017 2016 2015
2014 2013 2012 2011
2010 2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004 2003
2002 2001 2000 1999
1998 1997
Home Page | The Tasting | All the Results | How to Participate | Chardonnay du Monde
Who we are | Partnership | Press Area | The Chardonnay

Contact us : infos@chardonnay-du-monde.com